Terry Anderson was here…

…and gosh he was good!

His talk was gentle and rational, belying the fact that the ideas he was promoting were deeply subversive, when followed to their logical conclusion. The VLE is dead in the water, the PLE is the new kid on the block. Or rather, the old one. Because the things that we used to find difficult are now easy. We once needed a means to allow technophobes to publish content and interact online. What we got were the e-learning monoliths, epitomised (and patented) by BlackCT. Now, the new technologies are pervasive and connected, and develop emergent forms from the bottom up.  Anyone can publish content, anyone can engage with others, and we have great tools to link and mash technologies together.

Terry used the fact that Time Magazine made You the person of the year last year, but actually I think that they got it wrong: We are the person (not the people) of the year. The group mind has gained a voice and a vote. What does this mean for the teacher? For me, this was the central dynamic of the talk. Helping people to learn in this environment means shaking off our preconceptions and habits, to unlearn, not just what we were taught, but how we were taught. This is unsettling.

Terry Anderson 

I have followed and been influenced by Terry’s work for years. At last year’s ICALT we both had papers that, from slightly different angles, covered the same kind of ideas about social software. I hadn’t realised how close our ideas had become, however! The only significant difference now is that Terry does it better. Much better. A true guru, a great scholar and a charming man. 


Original: https://community.brighton.ac.uk/pg/blog/jd29/read/79520/terry-anderson-was-here
By: Jon Dron
Posted: March 20, 2007, 11:48 am

Terry Anderson was here…

…and gosh he was good!

His talk was gentle and rational, belying the fact that the ideas he was promoting were deeply subversive, when followed to their logical conclusion. The VLE is dead in the water, the PLE is the new kid on the block. Or rather, the old one. Because the things that we used to find difficult are now easy. We once needed a means to allow technophobes to publish content and interact online. What we got were the e-learning monoliths, epitomised (and patented) by BlackCT. Now, the new technologies are pervasive and connected, and develop emergent forms from the bottom up.  Anyone can publish content, anyone can engage with others, and we have great tools to link and mash technologies together.

Terry used the fact that Time Magazine made You the person of the year last year, but actually I think that they got it wrong: We are the person (not the people) of the year. The group mind has gained a voice and a vote. What does this mean for the teacher? For me, this was the central dynamic of the talk. Helping people to learn in this environment means shaking off our preconceptions and habits, to unlearn, not just what we were taught, but how we were taught. This is unsettling.

Terry Anderson 

I have followed and been influenced by Terry’s work for years. At last year’s ICALT we both had papers that, from slightly different angles, covered the same kind of ideas about social software. I hadn’t realised how close our ideas had become, however! The only significant difference now is that Terry does it better. Much better. A true guru, a great scholar and a charming man. 


Original: https://community.brighton.ac.uk/pg/blog/jd29/read/79520/terry-anderson-was-here
By: Jon Dron
Posted: March 20, 2007, 11:48 am

/Message: Pew Internet Study: Why Tagging Matters

Full story at: http://jondron.net/cofind/frshowresource.php?tid=5325&resid=1244

A summary of the Pew Foundation’s study of tagging behaviour among Internet citizens. You’re more likely to do it if you’re intelligent, well-paid and under 50, and less likely to do it if you’re white (at least in the US) Apparently around 7% of the population might be tagging on any given day, but overall just over a quarter of Internet users tag online content at some point.
So – control from the bottom-up relies on the activities of the minority. No great surprise I guess, but it would be nice if more people contributed.If it’s going to take off as an educational technology then I have one or two concerns about such a relatively small number controlling the shape of things.I’m not sure, because I would rather it were in the hands of those who know what they are doing and who understand what they are tagging and why, but there could be a vast untapped source of knowledge out there.
Created:Sun, 04 Feb 2007 06:16:57 GMT


Original: https://community.brighton.ac.uk/pg/blog/jd29/read/93928/message-pew-internet-study-why-tagging-matters
By: Jon Dron
Posted: February 3, 2007, 11:16 pm

the cluetrain manifesto – the book

http://jondron.cofind.net:80//frshowresource.php?uid=anon&pwd=&tgid=26&tid=5290&qid=&quality=&show=all&page=&searchstring=&returnto=&perpage=20&order=&expired=&resid=1243&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cluetrain.com%2Fbook.html The entire Cluetrain Manifesto is available online and makes good reading for anyone lost in the ways of the last century. Stirring stuff, not always right, but nearly always either thought-provoking or blindingly obvious, depending on which side of the fence you sit.
Created:Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:12:20 GMT


Original: https://community.brighton.ac.uk/pg/blog/jd29/read/72103/the-cluetrain-manifesto-the-book
By: Jon Dron
Posted: February 3, 2007, 7:12 am

Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems

http://jondron.cofind.net:80//frshowresource.php?uid=anon&pwd=&tgid=26&tid=5290&qid=&quality=&show=all&page=&searchstring=&returnto=&perpage=20&order=&expired=&resid=1242&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eurodl.org%2Fmaterials%2Fcontrib%2F2006%2FChristian_Dalsgaard.h A paper by Christian Dalsgaard which expresses a similar attitude to mine on system construction and social software’s benefits.
Created:Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:28:49 GMT


Original: https://community.brighton.ac.uk/pg/blog/jd29/read/72087/social-software-elearning-beyond-learning-management-systems
By: Jon Dron
Posted: February 1, 2007, 7:28 pm

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition (2000)

http://jondron.cofind.net:80//frshowresource.php?uid=anon&pwd=&tgid=26&tid=5290&qid=&quality=&show=all&page=&searchstring=&returnto=&perpage=20&order=&expired=&resid=1241&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nap.edu%2Fbooks%2F0309070368%2Fhtml%2F An interesting free book from The National Academies Press, which offers more than 3000 books online for free.

The book is a good intro to the subject, but what is particularly interesting from my perspective is the innovative and elegant way that the books on this site are presented. As well as a comprehensive range of navigation controls, each chapter has a ‘skim’ option, which presents a couple of paragraphs with the option to continue reading the page if it piques your interest. This is a great way to provide control to the reader and fits perfectly with my theory of transactional control (buy the book – ISBN: 1599043904), providing an exemplary model of how to build static hypertexts with different needs for control in mind. Unfortunately, it appears that the paragraphs shown are selected by the program, so they are far from always relevant: in fact, an apparent glitch in the system means that it selects empty ‘paragraphs’ from blank pages, with the offer to read more on that page. Good for a book on philosophy, but clearly needs tweaking!
Created:Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:07:19 GMT


Original: https://community.brighton.ac.uk/pg/blog/jd29/read/72086/how-people-learn-brain-mind-experience-and-school-expanded-edition-2000
By: Jon Dron
Posted: February 1, 2007, 3:07 pm